TechJournal South
Header

Posts Tagged ‘Amazon tax’

Group pushing for online sales taxes, sees unfair advantage

Wednesday, March 9th, 2011

MainStreetBy Allan Maurer

RESEARCH TRIANGLE, NC -  Have you ever purchased something from an online retailer such as Amazon to avoid paying sales taxes? A group called Alliance for Main Street Fairness (AMSF),  argues that by failing to collect sales taxes, online retailers have an unfair advantage over brick and mortar stores that is costing jobs, killing businesses and contributing to state budget deficits.

AMSF says it is funded by and advocates on behalf of employers who believe there must be a fair and balanced approach concerning the sales tax collection system. The group distributes the increasing number of media editorials supporting collection of sales taxes from online retailers.

We have reported on North Carolina’s attempts to get Amazon and other online retailers to collect sales taxes. The state, which requires residents to pay sales taxes on online and catalog purchases whether the retailer collects them or not, lost the first round of a federal court battle in which it sought to collect information on its resident’s purchases from Amazon. It has threatened to bill residents for sales taxes on Amazon purchases going back to 2003.

Federal law currently requires retailers to collect sales taxes in states where they have a nexus (a physical presence such as a store, warehouse or other facilities). Since Internet-only retailers do not have a nexus in most states, they are not currently required to collect the taxes.

Other states wrestling with the problem include Arkansas, California, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Texas. The National Conference of State Legislatures says states lost about $8.6 billion in 2010 in failing to collect sales tax from online and catalog sales. The number is projected to be approximately $37 billion from 2009 to 2012.

Personally, we can see how buying a big ticket item from an online retailer might save a significant pieces of change, but even there, we doubt that most people buy online just so they won’t have to pay sales taxes. We buy online because it is convenient. We can do our shopping from our desks, which has inherent advantages that will not disappear when online retailers collect sales taxes.

We shop online because we often find a much wider selection available at the lowest possible prices online, whether we are looking for a book, a camera, or a refrigerator. We save gas and wear and tear on our vehicles and ourselves. But we have never bought an item online to avoid paying a sales tax.

Sooner or later, we suspect, this problem will be resolved through legal means that require online retailers to collect state sales taxes. That’s fine with us, although we think states threatening to collect years of back taxes are certainly wrong-headed as well as on legally shaky ground.

In the meantime, the way states and the online retailers are going about dealing with the problem is just causing more problems: such as Amazon dismissing its associates in North Carolina and other states attempting to use their status to say the reatailer has the physical presence in the state to create a nexus.

That move causes grief for many online startup businesses. Some larger ones actually left North Carolina when Amazon fired its state associates, and others complain it makes it harder to get that early revenue necessary to achieve outside growth funding.

Amazon is not helping matters by negotiating not to pay sales taxes even in states such as Texas, Indiana, Nevada and Tennessee where they have distribution centers.

The whole mess will likely require action on the part of the US Congress.  “The Main Street Fairness Act,” H.R. 5660 was introduced in the US House in July 2010, and it would behoove Congress to vote on the bill.

While requiring online businesses to pay sales taxes may indeed help ailing state budgets and possibly help some brick and mortar retailers of big ticket items, we do not think it will do much to save book stores large or small or most other on the ground businesses from their online rivals.

E-commerce gained remarkable ground during the 2010 holiday season and we doubt that is because shoppers could avoid sales taxes. Brick and mortar retailers would be better off focusing on how they can develop an online marketing program and an online sales presence than bemoaning the perceived sales tax advantage. The real advantage of selling online, 24/7, is far greater than saving a few cents on the dollar.

Just today, AMSF launched a new web page in response to online-only retailers like Amazon.com threatening to terminate relationships with in-state affiliates to avoid playing by the same rules as Main Street and collecting sales tax.  AMSF says it is ready to help small businesses thrown under the bus by Amazon connect with other retailers who are interested in doing business with them and collect the sales tax at the point of purchase.

NC Settles Amazon sales tax dispute, reserves the right to go after customers – This piece includes links to a considerable amount of background information on the online sales tax dispute.

TechJournal South is a TechMedia company. TechMedia presents the annual conferences:

SoutheastVentureConference: www.seventure.org

Internet Summit: www.internetsummit.com

Digital East: www.digitaleast.com

Digital Summit: www.digitalsummit.com

Online travel companies sue NC over sales tax changes

Wednesday, February 9th, 2011

Travelocity

Travelosity is one of six companies suing the NC Department of Revenue over changes to the state sales tax law

DURHAM, NC – Six online travel companies have filed suit against the North Carolina Department of Revenue, alleging that changes to its sales tax law violate the Internet Tax Freedom Act.

The state amended its sales tax law to include fees charged by third-party intermediaries such as those collected by the suit’s plaintiffs, Orbitz, Trip Network, Travelosity, Travelscape, Hotels.com and Hotwire.

The companies say the changes impose a higher tax on online transactions than those levied on similar offline services, making it a discriminatory tax. They also argue they are not retailers and should not be required to collect sales taxes.

The suit also claims the amendments to the NC sales tax law are too vague, impair the plaintiffs contracts with hotels, and violate both the commerce clause in the US Constitution and the uniformity clause in the NC constitution. The travel companies want the changes declared unconstiutional and voided.

North Carolina has already lost one  battle over the sales tax law amendments. A Seattle Federal judge ruled that Amazon.com did not have to turn over customer names and information because doing so would violate their Constitutional First Amendment rights to free speech.

Amazon fired all of its NC “associates” when the state tried to say having them gave the company a presence in the state, allowing it to collect sales taxes. That move hurt many online startups that relied on associate relationships with Amazon for significant income or the early revenue needed to attract venture backing.

Some entrepreneurs told TechJournal South that the state’s attempt to wring sales tax money from Internet companies could make it seem unfriendly to tech companies. Like many states, the recession severely dampened North Carolina’s finances.

The state has not said if it will appeal that ruling.

Previously on TechJournal South: our previous coverage of North Carolina’s court battle with Amazon includes numerous background links on the issue:

Amazon customer privacy rights upheld

Lawyers battle over tax issue in Seattle Court

Amazon tax fracas already troubling NC Tech startups

Amazon customer privacy rights upheld, but battle likely to continue

Monday, November 8th, 2010

By Allan Maurer

AmazonSEATTLE – Reports by some media outlets in North Carolina suggest that up to 450 top out-of-state retailers may face audits of their books as the state tries to collect current and back sales taxes from the firms. In late October, however, a federal court judege in Seattle ruled that government requests for detailed information about Amazon.com customers purchases violates their rights of free speech, anonymity and privacy.

The ruling evolved from a lawsuit Amazon filed to stop the NC Department of Revenue (NCDOR) from gathering personally identifiable information about customers that could be linked to their specific Amazon buys.

The case has already disrupted the Internet sector startup community and some established online retailers in North Carolina, who lost their associate status as a result of North Carolina’s attempts to establish “nexus,” a retailer’s physical presence in a state via brick and mortar stores or warehouses and so on, that allows a state to collect sales taxes from the business. North Carolina argued that by having associates in NC, Amazon established nexus. Amazon responded by firing all of its NC associates, spurring some larger sellers to pull up stakes and leave the state.

American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of North Carolina Legal Foundation and ACLU of Washington intervened in the Amazon lawsuit on behalf of several Amazon.com customers.

Judge rules NC request violates First Amendment rights

Recognizing that government requests for expressive information can have an unconstitutional chilling effect on constitutionally-protected behavior, U.S. District Judge Marsha J. Pechman of the Western District of Washington at Seattle wrote:

“The First Amendment protects a buyer from having the expressive content of her purchase of books, music, and audiovisual materials disclosed to the government. Citizens are entitled to receive information and ideas through books, films, and other expressive materials anonymously. …The fear of government tracking and censoring one’s reading, listening, and viewing choices chills the exercise of First Amendment rights.”

Aden Fine, staff attorney with the ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project said, “This ruling is a victory for privacy and free speech on the Internet. Disclosing the purchase records of Internet users to the government would violate their constitutional rights to read and purchase the lawful materials of their choice, free from government intrusion, and undermine the very basis of American democracy and our cherished freedoms.”

He concluded, “With this ruling, the court emphatically reemphasized what other courts have found before – that government entities cannot watch over our shoulders to see what we are buying and reading.”

While Amazon, its customers and the ACLU may have won this round, it is likely only one battle in an ongoing war as states nationally scrounge for new taxes to bolster recession ravaged state budgets.

We’ll be making calls to the NCDOR and ACLU to follow up on this  story as it unfolds further.

To contact TJS editor/writer Allan Maurer: Allan at TechJournalSouth dot com.

Here’s the court decision.

More information is available here: Amazon.com vs. Kenneth R. Lay

Lawyers battle over Amazon tax (includes links to many background articles).

Lawyers battle over Amazon Tax issue in Seattle court

Thursday, October 14th, 2010

AmazonSEATTLE, WA – Will North Carolina residents be faced with paying back sales taxes on everything they may have bought from online retailer Amazon since 2003? In a court case with national implications, the ACLU, Amazon, and the state of North Carolina went head to head over the issue in a federal court in Seattle yesterday.

The ACLU and Amazon Inc. argued that North Carolina’s attempt to force the online retailer to divulge “a general idea” of what people from the state bought so it can levy sales taxes should be ruled unconstitutional.

U.S. District Judge Marsha Pechman expects to make a decision in the Amazon.com case within two weeks.

It is likely to be only the first round in this battle as cash-strapped states such as North Carolina, Colorado, and others try to force online retailers to pay sales taxes on products sold to their residents. The states are targeting other online retailers as well. Legal experts say that regardless of the decision, it is likely to be appealed.

Here’s an update on the court proceedings from the Seattle Times.

–By Allan Maurer (Allan at TechJournalSouth.com)

For background on the issue, which TechJournal South has covered since it emerged, see:

ACLU goes to court today over Amazon Tax

Amazon Tax case could go to the Supreme Court

The Tax Foundation sees the Amazon tax as unconstitiutional: Amazon tax unconstitutional

A good, multi-state overview from Stateline:

The ‘Amazon tax’ war escalates

Previously on TechJournal South:

Amazon tax fracas already troubling startups

North Carolina and other states spar with Web retailers

ACLU goes to court today to fight NC request for Amazon sales info

Wednesday, October 13th, 2010

ACLURESEARCH TRIANGLE, NC – The American Civil Liberties Union heads to Federal Court in Seattle today to argue that North Carolina’s request for information about purchases made by Amazon.com customers is unconstitutional and violates their rights to free speech, anonymity and privacy.

The NC Department of Revenue (NCDOR) contends that Amazon or its customers owe the state up to $50 million in unpaid sales taxes. The  state maintains it has not requested any personal information about Amazon customer purchases.

Amazon filed a lawsuit in April 2010 to halt the NCDOR from collecting personally identifiable information about its customers that could be linked to specific purchases on the Amazon site.

In June, the ACLU, ACLU of North Carolina Legal Foundation and ACLU of Washington intervened on behalf of seven Amazon customers.

The NCDOR has filed motions to dismiss both the Amazon and ACLU complaints. Amazon, in turn, filed a motion for summary judgment.

TechJournalSouth has been reporting on the Amazon case for some time. We have talked with several Internet entrepreneurs who say that the dispute between the state and Amazon has already caused difficulties.

The state’s position earlier led the online retailer to fire all of its Amazon Associates, because the state said having them created a physical presence in the state allowing it to collect sales taxes. That move means that some Internet startups have a tougher time developing that crucial early revenue necessary to attract seed or venture investments. Some online retailers who did significant business with Amazon simply pulled up stakes and moved to friendlier territory.

The whole issue is fairly complex and some say it won’t be solved until the Federal government intervenes to clarify rules regarding what constitutes a state’s right to tax Internet retailers without a physical store or offices in the state. –Allan Maurer

To reach TJS Editor/writer Allan Maurer: Allan at TechJournalSouth dot com.

For more information:

See: ACLU Amazon suit

The Tax Foundation sees the Amazon tax as unconstitiutional: Amazon tax unconstitutional

A good, multi-state overview from Stateline:

The ‘Amazon tax’ war escalates

Previously on TechJournal South:

Amazon tax fracas already troubling startups

North Carolina and other states spar with Web retailers

NC’s “Amazon tax” could backfire

ACLU joins Amazon suit against North Carolina’s tax audit request

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

ACLURALEIGH, NC – The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has joined the legal battle to halt North Carolina’s Department of Revenue from getting the names and addresses of people who bought merchandise from the online retailer since 2003 so it can collect a 7.5 percent sales tax on their purchases. The ACLU joined Amazon’s lawsuit, filed in Seattle in April to block North Carolina from obtaining the information.

Amazon, which maintains it has already provided the state with data about the purchases and says, as does the ACLU, that the request for personally identifying information violates their customers’ Constitutional rights.

Violates rights

“The Constitution does not permit government agencies to conduct such sweeping collections of our personal and private information,” Aden Fine, staff attorney with the ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project, said in a statement.

“Disclosing the purchase records of thousands of Amazon customers would violate their constitutional rights to read and purchase the lawful materials of their choice, free from government intrusion.”

“These product descriptions reveal highly expressive and private information about consumer choices: for example, whether a person has received a book on alcoholism or home workshop weaponry, a movie like ‘Brokeback Mountain,’ or ‘sexual wellness’ items such as sex toys,” the ACLU wrote in a letter to the Revenue Department last month.

North Carolina contends it never asked the retailer to turn over information revealing customers’ personal preferences. It says it asked Amazon only for product types purchased so it can assess tax liability. Estimates peg the amount of sales taxes the state loses to out-of-state businesses not collecting it at from $140 to $162 million this year.

The ongoing dispute centers on North Carolina’s attempt to collect taxes on purchases made from Amazon. The state contends that because Amazon had “Associates” in North Carolina, that established “nexus,” or a presence in the state that allows it to collect taxes. Nexus usually requires a firm to have brick and mortar stores or warehouses in a state.

Move hurt entrepreneurs

Amazon, in response, fired its North Carolina associates, a move that hurt numerous Internet entrepreneurs, as we reported previously.

In court papers filed Wednesday, the ACLU, representing six unnamed North Carolina residents, including four from the Research Triangle area, and Asheville Councilman Cecil Bothwell, says the state can assess taxes without knowing what customers bought.

The ACLU is not taking issue with North Carolina’s right to collect the sales taxes, only with its request for personal information.

Others, however, contend that “nexus” has not been clearly established and the state should not be attempting to collect the sales taxes at all.

Previously on TechJournal South:

Amazon tax fracas already troubling NC tech startups

Amazon sues NC to block request for personal data

NC’s “Amazon tax” could backfire

Is North Carolina’s “Amazon tax” all pain and no gain?

North Carolina and other states spar with Web retailers

Amazon tax fracas already troubling NC tech startups

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

By Allan Maurer

RESEARCH TRIANGLE, NC – The North Carolina Department of Revenue’s attempts to get Internet retailer Amazon.com to collect sales taxes on purchases by state residents has already caused trouble for Internet-based startups.

When the dispute began, North Carolina maintained that by having sales associates in the state, Amazon established what is called “nexus,” or the substantial presence the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled is necessary for a state to collect taxes from a company.

Amazon retaliated by dismissing all of its North Carolina sales affiliates, some of whom were doing substantial business and paying income taxes on the profits. Their only recourse was to leave the state.

Tougher for Internet startups

But entrepreneurs launching Internet-centric businesses in North Carolina continue to face a tougher uphill climb without the early income that the Amazon affiliate relationships produced.

Bill Bing and Mitesh Patel, for instance, tell us it has made it more difficult  to get some steam in the engine at their latest venture, Loyalese.com. They want Loyalese to be a free loyalty rewards program that gives consumers cash back for purchases made through Loyalese. “Affiliates would be a big part of our business,” says Bing.

The company launch is still a month away, but Bing says that when they talk to potential investors or partners, “They know we’re not going to Amazon on board and it’s an additional hurdle.

“The place it hits hardest is our ability to have that additional revenue stream,” Bing says. “It slows our ability to scale. It’s one more thing that makes it difficult to be in the Southeast instead of another geography.”

What will the long term impact be?

He adds, “This impacts our ability to create more jobs in the state. The state may collect a couple of million today, but the longterm cost to the state will be far greater.”

Some state estimates say North Carolina will lose $162 million or more in sales taxes on Internet purchases this year. The state sales tax is 5.75 percent.

The whole issue goes way beyond just North Carolina and Amazon, however. Many Internet retailers offer affiliate relationships that help Internet startups gain traction and obtain investments. Other states, including New York, and Colorado and others are also battling with Amazon and other Internet retailers over the sales tax issue.

“Everyone is waiting to see how this plays out,” says Bing.

Latest round: tax amnesty offered

In the latest round of events, North Carolina threatened Amazon with legal action if it did not provide the state with information on its residents’ purchases going back to 2003. Amazon countered by suing the state in federal court in Seattle, where it is located.

Serial entrepreneur Bob Butler, founder of Bestthinking.com, his latest venture, says, “Targeting one company with a tax law, rushing to file contempt charges, and instilling fear in its customers about tax audits and lost privacy is making this look like a blood feud.”

In the suit, Amazon contends that complying with the state’s demands would violate the privacy rights of people who may have bought “sensitive” books, tapes, dvds or other materials from the company. Amazon says those purchases amount to 50 million items.

North Carolina then offered Internet retailers what it calls “The Internet Transactions Resolution Program.” By joining the program and agreeing to collect sales and use taxes in the future, a business will not be assessed tax, penalties and interest for prior liability.

NC Revenue Secretary Ken Lay said the amnesty deal has nothing to do with Amazon’s suit. Uh huh.

A spokesperson for the NC Department of Justice tells us its attorney’s are preparing a response to the Amazon suit, but has no comment on it at this time.

Federal intervention needed?

Catherine Fox-Simpson of major tax advisory firm BDO, tells us, “States are becoming very aggressive. They’ve seen a huge drop in their revenue. It’s impacting every business, but small businesses are taking a lot of the burden.”

She agrees with Tech America’s Senior Director of Tax Policy, Bartlett Cleland who told us in a previous interview on the topic that Congress needs to step into the fray and settle the issue on a federal level. “But I think that’s a long way from happening,” says Fox-Simpson.

An ugly battle of wills

“Because of the Internet, it’s now easy to become a multi-state business,” she says. “The way businesses enter and exit states regularly makes it very complicated.”

Butler, who feels the affects of all this directly, since his new business would have profited from an Amazon affiliate relationship, concludes, “Our universities, tech industry, life sciences, and reputation for business friendly public policies have long been the four cornerstones of the economic success of NC.

“This ugly battle of wills undermines the NC tech industry and destroys any perception that NC is business friendly.  It’s time for the Governor or General Assembly to step up and call for a time out and consider that the collateral damage, which began with 6,000 NC websites losing tens of millions in revenue and investment capital, will continue for many years beyond the current budget crisis.”

For further reading:

The Tax Foundation sees the Amazon tax as unconstitiutional: Amazon tax unconstitutional

A good, multi-state overview from Stateline:

The ‘Amazon tax’ war escalates

Previously on TechJournal South:

North Carolina and other states spar with Web retailers

NC’s “Amazon tax” could backfire

Amazon sues NC to block request for personal data

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

RALEIGH, NC – Amazon.com has filed a suit to prevent the North Carolina Department of Revenue from learning what state residents bought from the online retailer so they can collect sales taxes on the buys.

Amazon filed the suit in federal court in Seattle Monday. It names NC Revenue Secretary Ken Lay as defendant.

Amazon wants the court to order a halt to the Revenue department’s attempt to secure the information, saying it violates the First Amendment.

No stores or warehouse in state

Amazon does not have a physical presence in North Carolina such as stores or warehouses, so it does not have to collect the sales tax information for the state.

North Carolina passed a controversial law last year requiring out-of-state retailers such as Amazon to collect sales taxes from state residents if the retailer had affiliates in the state, claiming that established the physical presence required for North Carolina to collect sales taxes on purchases.

Amazon dumps NC affiliates

Amazon responded by ending its North Carolina affiliate program, a blow to many Internet startups that need early income to establish a viable business model and obtain further funding.

Amazon, while known for its book and media sales, also offers many other products and some state firms simply moved to other states to continue their business with Amazon.

Threatened with contempt hearings

In March, NC threatened to hold civil contempt hearings if Amazon didn’t provide the names and addresses of NC residents who purchased anything from the company since August 2003.

Amazon contends such disclosure invades the privacy of buyers and violates their First Amendment rights “on a massive scale.”

Amazon says in the suit that its sales are primarily “expressive materials” such as movies, music and books and giving the state information on those purchases could affect buying habits by revealing items that may be personal, sensitive or controversial.

In the suit, Amazon states: “Amazon asserts the privacy and First Amendment rights of itself and of its customers so that Amazon may sell – and customers may read, hear or view – a broad range of popular and unpopular expressive materials with the customers’ private content choices protected from unnecessary government scrutiny,”

Thorny legal issues

We have covered North Carolina’s attempt to collect sales taxes from Amazon in detail in a series of articles.

Pressured by recession-caused budget deficits of disturbing proportions, NC, like many other states, is seeking new revenue from any potentially lucrative possibility. Amazon itself says state residents have made 50 million purchases since August 2003, so the amount in question is far from trivial.

The legal issues are thorny and less clear than either side might wish, but this suit may begin a process of clarification. North Carolina is not the only state trying to collect sales taxes from online retailers.

Many legal authorities think the matter of states collecting sales taxes from online retailers who do not have a physical presence in the state will eventually have to be decided by Congress on a federal level.

We have covered this issue extensively at TechJournal South.

We found entrepreneurs disturbed about not being able to develop crucial early income streams, Tech organizations say the state is singling out the tech sector unfairly and with questionable legal basis, and the state responds it is losing up to $300 million a year.

Previously on TechJournal South:

NC’s “Amazon tax” could backfire

Is North Carolina’s “Amazon tax” all pain and no gain?

North Carolina and other states spar with Web retailers

Amazon terminates NC sales associates