TechJournal South
Header

Archive for the ‘Healthcare’ Category

Consumers want wireless communication with physicians

Wednesday, October 26th, 2011

CEAA new study by the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) reveals that consumers are interested in communicating with their doctors via wireless devices. The study, The New Role of Technology in Consumer Health and Wellness, examines consumer perceptions and attitudes in using technology products to maintain their health and wellness.

According to the study, 36 percent of consumers say they would be interested in sending health data to their doctor via a wireless device; 33 percent are interested in managing their health records online; and 32 percent would be willing to consult with their doctor via online video.

“New technologies change the way we communicate with our doctors, and consumers are seeking mobile apps that cut down on the need for appointments, reduce costs and increase efficiency,” said Ben Arnold, senior research analyst at CEA. “Doctors play a major role in educating consumers about technology, as more than half of consumers said they consult their healthcare provider for information on health technology devices.”

Among specific devices, consumers indicated the highest interest in body weight scales (44 percent), vital sign meters and gauges (40 percent) and devices that record progress through a fitness plan (37 percent). Among those who have downloaded mobile health and fitness applications, the most popular choices are nutrition trackers (51 percent), fitness apps that measure workout regimens (36 percent) and customized music apps for exercise (32 percent). The popularity of health and fitness technology is also reflected in the 2012 International CES Digital Health and Fitness TechZone, which will feature innovative new technology products and services that address this burgeoning marketplace.

“As wireless services and device capabilities continue to improve, mobile health and fitness app ownership will continue to increase,” Arnold said. “Consumers value the ability of such apps to analyze data and provide recommendations that can motivate behavioral changes.”

The New Role of Technology in Consumer Health and Wellness (October 2011) study was fielded in September 2011. It was designed and formulated by CEA Market Research, which offers the most comprehensive source for sales data, forecasts, consumer research and historical trends for the consumer electronics industry. Please cite any information to the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA)®. The complete study is available free to CEA member companies at members.CE.org. Non-members may purchase the study for $999 at the CEA Store.

Internet Summit offers impressive lineup of the top names in tech

Thursday, October 20th, 2011

Internet Summit 2011Who’s attending Internet Summit 2011? Four weeks until the event set for November 15-16 at the Raleigh, NC Convention Center, a better question is who’s not attending!

With over 120 speakers and presenters, Internet Summit 2011 is jam-packed with top level content focused on the latest digital trends, online marketing techniques and IT best practices.

We’ve been covering TechMedia’s digital conferences since the very first one, and we have to admit, this is the most impressive lineup yet. Stay tuned for interviews with participants here on the TechJournal leading up to the event.

Here’s a sampling of firms already scheduled to attend:

1st Degree Marketing
3tailer
919 Marketing Company
A10 Clinical Solutions
ABB
Accelerence
ACCSports.com
Adam-Bryce
AdKeeper
Advanced Energy
Adzerk
Agile Marketing Group
AirClean Systems
All American Corporation
Alloso Technologies
ALPHA Marketing
Alternate Access
American Society for Microbiology
Americaneagle.com
Aon
APC
Apple
Argyle Social
Arketi Group
ASPE ROI
Atlantic Webworks
Atlantis Group
Autoshop Solutions
BB&T
BBH Media
BCBSNC
BEM
Bespoke Arsenal
BGEA
Big Think
BIOPHARMA ADVISORS
Blogads
BlueGlass Interactive
Bosch Packaging Services
Brand Fuel
Brand.net
BRI
Brick Marketing
Brightleaf Consulting Group
Brocadiant IP
Bronto
Brooks Bell
Buddy Media
Bulk TV & Internet
Bulwark Exterminating
BurlapSky
Burson-Marsteller
Burt’s Bees
CAI
Cameron Carmichael
Capstrat
CareAnyware
Carolina Biological Supply Company
Carolina Meadows
Carrot-Top Industries
Cary Academy
Caterpillar
CBC New Media
Cenduit
Center for Responsible Lending
Centerline Digital
Cerium Capital
CESI Debt Solutions
ChannelAdvisor
Charlotte Regional Partnership
Chatsworth Products
Cherry Bekaert & Holland
Cisco Systems
City of Raleigh
ClearSight Creative Resources
Clearspring Technologies
Coalmarch Productions
Command Partners
Comporium
Compuware
Connections Too
Consultwebs.com
Contactology
Contender Capital
Contour Products
Craven Community College
Cree
CROSSROADS PUBLIC RELATIONS
DASH Systems
DataChambers
DataFlux
Dealer Ignition
DecisionPoint
Deere & Company
Delta Apparel
Devonhall Publishing
Dex One
Digital Element
Digital Strategies and Services
Direct Mobile
Discovery Communications
Distil
Distilled
Dominion Enterprises
Downtown Raleigh Alliance
Dreamcatcher Trading
Duke Medicine
Duke University
Easter Seals
Easyfish Marketing
EatDrinkDeals
Eaton Corporation
Eckel & Vaughan
Emerald Isle Realty
Emma
Ernst & Young
ESPN
ExactByte
Exclusively Weddings
FanBridge
FeatureTel/Telovations
FinOps Solutions
FireFold
Fireside Distributors
First Bank
Fitter Happier Consulting
FitTwin.com
Fleishman Hillard
For Rent Media Solutions
Forma
French/West/Vaughan
fsb
Full Scale Solutions
GiftOasis.com
Global Value Commerce
GlobalSpec
GoECart
Google
Governor’s Institute
Gowalla
Grant Thornton LLP
Greater Raleigh CVB
HaggleBuyers.com
HBA of Raleigh-Wake Co.
Heartbeat Marketing
Heta Corporation
HIPPO Internet Marketing Training
HireNetworks
hood river lavender farms
HowStuffWorks.com
Hughes Pittman & Gupton
Hutchison Law Group
IBM
iContact
IDBS
IDEA Fund Partners
If It Barks
Ignite Social Media
IMLeagues
INDA
Inertia
Infogroup
Integritive
Interface Technologies
Intersouth Partners
Inversion Group
Investors Mosaic
iT People Corporation
It’s Your Turn
Jaargon
JDSU
John Deere
Julie Holmes Design
Kadro
KD Web Strategies
Kerr Drug
KeyphraSEOlogy
Khush
Kramden Institute
L A Foster & Associates
Lakewinds Natural Foods
Left Click Studios
Lenovo
Lenox
Lewis Advertising
LexisNexis
LFG
Lincoln Financial
LinkMeIn
ListLikeThis
Litle & Co
Llamawerx
Lohmueller
Low Fat Designs
Lowes Foods
Loyalese
Lulu.com
Lumi Mobile
M.Y. Edge
Madison River Ventures
Manning Fulton
Marin Software
Market America
Market Vue Partners
Marketing Pilgrim
Marketing Resource Solutions
Marshall Institute
Maxpoint Interactive
Media Two Interactive
MedThink Communications
MemberHub.com
Meredith Communications
Method Savvy
Microsoft
Monster MediaWorks
Mooty
Motricity
Mountainside Digital Media
mPower Consulting
myYearbok
NBT Partners
NC National Guard
NC SBTDC
NC Sea Grant
NC State University
NCASI
NCSU
Net Friends
Net32
NetApp
Netsertive
New Kind
New Media Campaigns
Newland Communities
NSTAR Global Services
O3
OtherScreen
Paragon Application Systems
PARcycles
Parker Web
Patagonia Health
Pathos Ethos
PBS
Peak10
Pegasus Lighting
Pentaho
Peoplefluent
PGN
PHE
Phonebooth.com
Piedmont Plastics
Pivot Point Group
Pluot’s
PointClick Technologies
Pointer Advertising
Polished Geek
POLITICO
POOLCENTER.com
Poole College of Management
Poyner Spruill
PPD
Progressive
Project Right Track
Protea Digital
Prudential YSU
Prymak
PSA TechSure
QOL-Apps
Quaero
Quickrelay Networks
Railinc
Rankin McKenzie
RBC Bank
ReadWriteWeb
Red Hat
Relevantor
Religent Health
Rex Healthcare
Ripple Group
RMM
Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson
Rockett Interactive
RSA Security
RTI International
RTP Designs
S&A Cherokee
SafeNet
Sage
SAI Digital
Salix
Sally Johns Design
SAManage
SAS
SBTDC
SC GtUG
Scale Finance
Scenera
ScentTrail E-Commerce
Science Applications International
SciQuest
Scribble Studio
Semetric Media
Sensus
SEOinhouse
SharedVue
ShareFile
Siemens Energy
Signal
Signature Cuisine
Silver Pearl
Sinclair & Co.
Sirchie
Skookum Digital Works
SkyGrid
Skyline Exhibits / The Holt Group
Small Footprint
Smart Online
Smith Moore Leatherwood
Smith, Anderson
Snyder Interactive
SOBcon
Social Buzz Lab
Southern Capitol Ventures
Spain Business Advisors
Spider Digital
SplendidCRM Software
Sprung Media Makers
Square 1 Bank
State Farm Insurance
Storkie
STORMS Associates
Stripes Group
StumbleUpon
Symplegades
Syncfusion
Taddy
TagMan
TagSeats
Tangram Media
Tavve
Team Powersports
TechCFO RTP
TechCo
Tekelec
Teknicks
TenPearls
Terraine
The Andrus Group
The Bloom Agency
The Body Shop
The brpr Group
The Doug And Jon Show
The Green Kangaroo
The Signature Agency
The Word Factory
TheAvenueToTheFuture
TheeDesign Studio
TheLadders
Think Technology Advisors
Three Ships Media
Time Warner
TimelyText
Tizbi
tranquil hosting
Trone
Tropical Foods
Troutman Sanders LLP
TRUSTe
tw telecom
Twiddy & Co
Twitpic
UNC
UNC Charlotte
UNC Wilmington
Usability Sciences
Vaco
Value Drug Company
Van Tharp Institute
VaynerMedia
VCE
Vegan Bodybuilding & Fitness
Verisign
Vibrant Media
Viddler
Virtual Race Bags
VisionPoint Marketing
Wake Tech
Walker Interactive
WDI
Web Analytics Demystified
WebCookingClasses.com
Wells Fargo
Whitmeyer Tuffin
Williams Mullen
WilsonMcGuire Creative
Windstream
Womble Carlyle
Work By Kevin
workplace options
WUNC
Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP
XPIENT Solutions
Yahoo!
Yardi Systems
ZDNet

Venture capital investments decline in both dollars and deals in Q3

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

Venture capitalists invested $6.95 billion in 876 deals in the third quarter of 2011, falling in both dollars and deal volume, according to the MoneyTree Report from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) and the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA), based on data provided by Thomson Reuters.

The software industry saw the highest level of funding and was one of the few to see an increase in dollars invested. Early stage funding deals represented nearly half the total dollars invested, although first time financing deals fell 22 percent.

Quarterly venture capital (VC) investment activity fell 12 percent in terms of dollars and 14 percent in the number of deals compared to the second quarter of 2011 when $7.9 billion was invested in 1,015 deals. For the first three quarters of 2011, venture capitalists invested $21.2 billion into 2,725 deals, representing 20 percent more dollars and three percent more deals as the first three quarters of 2010.

Life sciences industries see marked decline in dollars and deals

The Life Sciences (biotechnology and medical device industries combined) and Clean Technology sectors saw marked decreases in both dollars and number of deals while the Software sector enjoyed its strongest quarter in almost 10 years.

“Challenges in the regulatory environment for Life Sciences companies are prompting VCs to look to other industries to put their money to work for a faster return on their investment as indicated by the notable increase in Software investments,” remarked Tracy T. Lefteroff, global managing partner of the venture capital practice at PwC US.

“Accordingly, over the past two quarters, we’ve seen a clear shift in Life Sciences investments from Seed/Early Stage companies over to more Later Stage companies. VCs are continuing to support the companies in their pipeline but appear to be curbing their investments in new Life Sciences companies.

Despite the dip in Life Sciences and in the overall investment total for Q3, 2011 is still on track to exceed the $23.3 billion invested in all of 2010.” “Given the tremendous impact that venture capital has on company creation, it is easy to forget that our industry is small and highly susceptible to the many market forces presently at work,” said Mark Heesen, president of the NVCA.

“Public policy challenges in the life sciences and clean technology sectors are impacting investment levels this quarter as is the IPO market that basically came to a screeching halt in August.

Venture fundraising levels are the lowest they have been in nearly a decade so it is reasonable to expect investment levels to decline in the coming years. Yet despite the challenges, the industry continues to fund new companies because history has shown us that innovation always prevails and there remains significant promise across all industry sectors for these emerging growth companies.”

Software industry received highest level of funding

The Software industry received the highest level of funding for all industries with $2.0 billion invested during the third quarter of 2011. This level of investment represents a 23 percent increase in dollars, compared to the $1.6 billion invested in the second quarter, and the highest quarterly investment in the sector since the fourth quarter of 2001.

The Software industry also had the most deals completed in Q3 with 263 rounds, which represents a one percent decrease from the 267 rounds completed in the second quarter of 2011. The Biotechnology industry was the second largest sector for dollars invested with $1.1 billion going into 96 deals, falling 18 percent in dollars and 20 percent in deals from the prior quarter.

Medical device industry sees decline

The Medical Devices and Equipment industry also experienced a decline, dropping 18 percent in Q3 to $728 million, while the number of deals declined 21 percent to 74 deals.

Overall, investments in the Life Sciences sector (Biotechnology and Medical Devices) fell 18 percent in dollars and 21 percent in deals, dropping to the second lowest quarterly deal volume since the first quarter of 2005.

To the contrary, Healthcare Services investments surged with $152 million going into 11 deals, a 200 percent increase in dollars and 38 percent increase in deal volume over the second quarter. Investment in Internet-specific companies fell in the third quarter to $1.6 billion going into 231 deals. This level of investment represents a 33 percent decrease in dollars and a 21 percent decrease in deals from the second quarter when $2.4 billion went into 292 deals, a ten-year high.

Internet-specific is a discrete classification assigned to a company with a business model that is fundamentally dependent on the Internet, regardless of the company’s primary industry category.

The Clean Technology sector, which crosses traditional MoneyTree industries and comprises alternative energy, pollution and recycling, power supplies and conservation, saw a 13 percent decrease in dollars to $891 million in Q3 from the second quarter when $1.0 billion was invested.

The number of deals completed in the third quarter also declined nine percent to 80 deals compared with 88 deals in the second quarter Fourteen of the 17 MoneyTree sectors experienced decreases in dollars invested in the third quarter, including:

Telecommunications (49 percent decrease), Semiconductors (44 percent decrease), Consumer Products & Services (51 percent decrease), and Media & Entertainment (11 percent decrease).

Stage of Development Seed stage investments fell 56 percent in dollars and 26 percent in deals with $179 million invested into 89 deals in the third quarter. Early stage investments also fell seven percent in dollars and six percent in deals with $2.0 billion going into 341 deals.

Seed/early stage deals nearly half the total

Seed/Early stage deals accounted for 49 percent of total deal volume in Q3, compared to 48 percent in the second quarter. The average Seed deal in the third quarter was $2.0 million, down from $3.3 million in the second quarter. The average Early stage deal was $5.7 million in Q3, down from $5.8 million in the prior quarter.

Expansion stage dollars increased two percent in the third quarter, with $2.5 billion going into 260 deals. Overall, Expansion stage deals accounted for 30 percent of venture deals in the third quarter, up from 26 percent in the second quarter of 2011. The average Expansion stage deal was $9.6 million, up from $9.2 million in the prior quarter. Investments in Later stage deals decreased 20 percent in dollars and 30 percent in deals to $2.3 billion going into 186 rounds in the third quarter.

Later stage deals accounted for 21 percent of total deal volume in Q3, compared to 26 percent in Q2 when $2.9 billion went into 265 deals. The average Later stage deal in the third quarter was $12.5 million, which increased from $11.0 million in the prior quarter and represents the largest average deal size for Later stage companies since the third quarter of 2001.

First-time financings fell 22 percent

First-Time Financings First-time financing (companies receiving venture capital for the first time) dollars decreased 22 percent and the number of deals fell 18 percent with $1.2 billion going into 269 deals. First-time financings accounted for 17 percent of all dollars and 31 percent of all deals in the third quarter, compared to 20 percent of all dollars and 32 percent of all deals in the second quarter of 2011.

Companies in the Software, Media & Entertainment, and IT services sectors received the most first time rounds in the third quarter. There was a significant decline in the number and dollar level of first time rounds in the Life Sciences sector.

The average first-time deal in the third quarter was $4.5 million, down slightly from $4.7 million in the prior quarter. Seed/Early stage companies received the bulk of first-time investments, garnering 74 percent of the deals. MoneyTree Report results are available online at www.pwcmoneytree.com and www.nvca.org

Blackberry faces sharp decline in enterprise use

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

Blackberry

A Blackberry phone

UPDATED – More than 30% of BlackBerry users in large enterprises (those with greater than 10,000 employees) expect to migrate to a different platform within the next year, according to primary research from leading analyst firm, Enterprise Management Associates (EMA). Blackberry issued a statement in response to the report.

This represents a significant reduction from the platforms current domination of the large enterprise market space with 52% of mobile device users in that demographic actively using a BlackBerry device as part of their job function.

Research in Motion (RIM) ushered in the first broad enterprise adoption of mobile devices with the introduction of the BlackBerry in 2003.

The mobile devices quickly gained popularity for their ability to deliver email and other messaging capabilities to employees, replacing antiquated pager systems.

To enable email delivery and other device management functionality, RIM delivered the BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES). With broad investment in both the BlackBerry devices and the BES management platform among particularly large businesses, RIM rapidly grew to become the dominant player in enterprise mobile device management.

Overturning the Apple cart

The entire industry, however, was turned on its head when Apple introduced the first iPhone in 2007. Since then, the proliferation of iPhones and iPhone-like devices (most notably those built on Android platforms) has slowly been chipping away at BlackBerry’s dominance of the enterprise space. Now it appears, that market share loss is accelerating.

“We expected to see some market share loss by RIM, but these results were far more dramatic than we could have anticipated,” reported Steve Brasen, EMA Managing Research Director.

“Both enterprises and employees indicated they were broadly abandoning BlackBerry devices for primarily Android and iOS platforms – and this data was collected before the recent BlackBerry service failures, which can be expected to even further accelerate migration.”

Lack of user satisfaction with Blackberry

According to EMA’s research results, the reason for the mass abandonment of BlackBerry devices is primarily due to a lack of user satisfaction. If fact, only 16% of respondents to EMA’s survey indicated they were completely satisfied with their BlackBerry smartphone versus 44% of iPhone users. Increasingly, employees are utilizing their own mobile devices for business purposes, so end user satisfaction is proportionally growing as a critical adoption consideration.

Further details on mobile device platform adoption, usage, challenges, and management practices are available in the EMA publication, “Enterprise Mobile Device Management: How Smartphones and Tablets are Changing Workforce IT Requirements.”

For the research, two separate surveys were performed – one focused on end users requirement and experiences and the other designed to report on how enterprise IT managers are supporting the devices. Combined together, the survey results provide a detailed cross-section of enterprise mobile device usage, trends, challenges and best practices across the entire range of business sizes and industry types.

RIM issued the following statement in response to the survey:

“While we haven’t reviewed Enterprise Management Associates’ latest survey, we would be interested in finding out if the customers surveyed have upgraded to RIM’s new line-up of BlackBerry 7 smartphones such as the all-touch BlackBerry® Torch 9850; the BlackBerry® Torch 9810 touch screen with slide-out keyboard; the new BlackBerry Bold 9900; or the new BlackBerry® Curve.

These are the fastest, most powerful BlackBerry smartphones yet and we encourage comparisons with these current BlackBerry smartphones vs earlier models. We also encourage our CIO customers to upgrade their organizations’ BlackBerry deployments with the latest version of RIM’s market-leading BlackBerry Enterprise Server (version 5.0.3).

BlackBerry Enterprise Server 5.0.3 is required to support the latest BlackBerry devices, includes time-saving capabilities for IT departments, and features BlackBerry® Balance™ technology supporting the secure use of a single company-owned or employee-owned BlackBerry smartphone for both work and personal. Customers can find out more about the latest line-up of BlackBerry 7 devices and the many advanced features of BlackBerry Enterprise Server 5.0.3 at www.blackberry.com.”

EMA’s research for download.

Software companies dominate Deloitte’s 2011Tech Fast 500

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

DeloitteSoftware companies dominate on Deloitt’s 2011 Technology Fast 500, an annual ranking of the fastest growing technology, media, telecommunications, life sciences and clean technology companies in North America. Software firms account for 39 percent of the entire list, with 194 companies. Not surprisingly the West is home to the most (37%) Fast 500 tech firms.

Five of the top 10 companies in this year’s rankings are from the software industry, including Avigilon (No. 4), ServiceNow (No. 5), NexJ Systems Inc. (No. 6), Real Matters (No. 7) and HubSpot (No. 8).

MAKO Surgical Corp., an orthopedic medical device company based in Fort Lauderdale, Fl., ranked No. 1.

MAKO Surgical Corp.’s fiscal year revenue of $44.29 million and five year fiscal growth rate of 70,211 percent topped this year’s ranking which is based on the percentage of fiscal year revenue growth from 2006 to 2010.

“Deloitte’s Technology Fast 500 recognizes some of the most exciting technology companies in North America today,” saidEric Openshaw, vice chairman and U.S. Technology, Media & Telecommunications leader, Deloitte LLP. “We are proud to honor MAKO Surgical Corp., and we congratulate all of the ranked companies for their extraordinary achievements.”

The top ten ranked companies are as follows:

2011 Rank Company Sector Revenue Growth(2006 to 2010) City, State
1 MAKO Surgical Corp.www.makosurgical.com Medical Equipment 70,211 percent Ft. Lauderdale, FL
2 Accedian Networkswww.accedian.com Communications/Networking 50,136 percent Saint-Laurent, QC
3 RTI Cryogenics Inc.www.rticryo.com Clean Technology 46,278 percent Cambridge, ON
4 Avigilonwww.avigilon.com Software 38,796 percent Vancouver, BC
5 ServiceNowwww.service-now.com Software 32,048 percent San Diego, CA
6 NexJ Systems Inc.www.nexj.com Software 29,161 percent Toronto, ON
7 Real Matterswww.realmatters.com Software 28,265 percent Markham, ON
8 HubSpotwww.hubspot.com Software 27,746 percent Cambridge, MA
9 AVI BioPharma, Inc.www.avibio.com Biotechnology/Pharmaceutical 25,483 percent Bothell, WA
10 ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.www.ariad.com Biotechnology/Pharmaceutical 19,875 percent Cambridge, MA

Mark Jensen, managing partner of Deloitte’s national venture capital services group, added, “During the 17 years Deloitte has published this list, some deeply entrenched patterns have evolved. Software companies have dominated year-over-year, and the western and northeastern regions of the U.S. have consistently attracted innovative, high growth companies.”

West region yields highest concentration of Fast 500 companies, followed by Northeast

Overall, the West remains home to the highest concentration of Technology Fast 500 companies (37 percent), trailed by the Northeast (24 percent), Canada (15 percent), Southeast (12 percent), Midwest (6 percent), and Southwest (6 percent).

Region Percent of List Fastest-growingCompany in the

Region

City, State
West 37 percent ServiceNowwww.service-now.com San Diego, CA
Northeast 24 percent HubSpotwww.hubspot.com Cambridge, MA
Canada 15 percent Accedian Networkswww.accedian.com Saint-Laurent, QC
Southeast 12 percent MAKO Surgical Corp.www.makosurgical.com Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Midwest 6 percent Gevo, Inc.www.gevo.com Englewood, CO
Southwest 6 percent SoftLayerwww.softlayer.com Dallas, TX

Software sector dominates – again

Five of the top 10 companies in this year’s rankings are from the software industry, including Avigilon (No. 4), ServiceNow (No. 5), NexJ Systems Inc. (No. 6), Real Matters (No. 7) and HubSpot (No. 8).

The software sector comprises 39 percent of the overall list with 194 companies, followed by biotechnology (15 percent), communications/networking (12 percent) and Internet (11 percent).  Medical equipment, scientific/technical instrumentation, semiconductor, computers/peripherals, media/entertainment and clean technology companies round out the remaining 23 percent of the list.

The percentage of companies from industry sectors are represented on Deloitte’s Technology Fast 500 as follows:

Sector Percent of List Fastest-growingCompany in the Sector City, State
Software 39 percent Avigilonwww.avigilon.com Vancouver, BC
Biotechnology/Pharmaceutical 15 percent AVI BioPharma, Inc.www.avibio.com Bothell, WA
Communications/Networking 12 percent Accedian Networkswww.accedian.com Saint-Laurent, QC
Internet 11 percent SAY Media, Inc.www.saymedia.com San Francisco, CA
Medical Equipment 7 percent MAKO Surgical Corp.www.makosurgical.com Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Clean Technology 5 percent RTI Cryogenics Inc.www.rticryo.com Cambridge, ON
Semiconductor 4 percent MaxLinear, Inc.www.maxlinear.com Carlsbad, CA
Media and Entertainment 3 percent Collectivewww.collective.com New York, NY
Computers/Peripherals 2 percent PlumChoicewww.plumchoice.com Billerica, MA
Scientific/TechnicalInstrumentation 2 percent Digital Ally, Inc.www.digitalallyinc.com Overland Park, KS

Technology Fast 500 Ranking Methodology

In order to be eligible for Technology Fast 500™ recognition, companies must own proprietary intellectual property or technology that is sold to customers in products that contribute to a majority of the company’s operating revenues.  Companies must have base-year (2006) operating revenues of at least $50,000 USD or CD, and current-year (2010) operating revenues of at least $5 million USD or CD. Additionally, companies must be in business for a minimum of five years, and be headquartered within North America.

Ranking is rounded to the nearest percentage point. Revenue growth is calculated as follows: [(FY'2010 revenue – FY'2006 revenue)/ FY'2006 revenue] x 100.  For example, a company with reported revenues of $350,000 in 2006 and$7,500,000 in 2010 would have fiscal year revenue growth of 2,043 percent during the period from 2006 to 2010.

The ranking is compiled from nominations submitted directly to the Technology Fast 500™ Web site, and public company database research conducted by Deloitte.  Deloitte has not audited the ranking and, accordingly, does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on it.  Some companies that may be eligible to appear on the ranking are not included because they did not submit the required information or otherwise declined to participate.

For additional detail on the Technology Fast 500™ including the complete list and qualifying criteria, visit www.fast500.com.

As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please seewww.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting.

 

SOURCE Deloitte

Back to topRELATED LINKS
http://www.deloitte.com

Health care costs will breach 10K per employee in 2012

Monday, October 3rd, 2011

AonWhile health care costs are projected to increase at a lower rate in 2012 compared to 2011, the average cost per employee will surpass the $10,000 mark for the first time next year, according to Aon Hewitt, the global human resource consulting and outsourcing business of Aon Corporation (NYSE: AON).

We’re not sure how long this can go on. Many health insurers are tussling with state regulators on how much they will be allowed to raise premiums. With the country skidding along the edges of a double-dip recession, the added burden of health care costs far outrunning any income growth except among the wealthy, health care costs continue to take a larger and larger chunk of not only employer funds, but also of their already cash-strapped employees.

According to Aon Hewitt’s analysis, the 2012 average health care premium rate increase will be 7.0 percent, which is slightly lower than the 7.5 percent mark in 2011, and on par with the 6.9 percent increase in 2010.

However, the average total health care premium per employee for large companies is projected to be $10,475 in 2012, up from $9,792 in 2011, and $9,111 in 2010.

The amount employees will be asked to contribute toward this premium cost in 2012 is $2,306 (or 22 percent of the total health care premium), compared to $2,084 in 2011 (or 21.3 percent of the total health care premium), and $1,952 in 2010 (or 21.4 percent of the total health care premium).

Meanwhile, average employee out-of-pocket costs, such as copayments, coinsurance and deductibles, are expected to be $2,275 in 2012, compared to $2,007 in 2011, and $1,691 in 2010.

Older workers lead to catastrophic claims increases

According to Aon Hewitt, a number of factors are driving the projected increase in health care cost for 2012. Employers continue to experience an increase in the quantity and cost of catastrophic claims, as slower levels of hiring have resulted in slightly older workforces who are more prone to costly medical conditions.

In addition, generally poorer health – leading to increases in costly conditions such as diabetes and heart disease – make it difficult for employers to deploy tactics that drive short-term cost savings.  As a result, employers continue to ask employees to absorb increases through a combination of out-of-pocket cost and increased payroll contributions.

“In what continues to be an uncertain economic environment, organizations cannot afford health care costs growing at 7 percent each year,” said John Zern, executive vice president and the Americas Practice Director for Health & Benefits with Aon Hewitt.  ”While health care reform continues to represent potential systemic change in a few years, employers will continue to shift cost to employees in order to keep company costs to a manageable level.”

Cost by Plan Type

On average, Aon Hewitt forecasts that companies will realize 2012 cost increases of 7.8 percent for health maintenance organization plans (HMOs), 6.6 percent for preferred provider organizations (PPOs) and 6.6 percent for point-of-service (POS).  That means from 2011 to 2012, the average cost per person for major companies is estimated to increase from $10,344 to$11,151 for HMOs, $9,417 to $10,038 for PPOs and $10,375 to $11,059 for POS plans.

2011 Cost Increases by Major Metropolitan Area

In 2011, major U.S. markets that experienced rate increases higher than the national average included Orlando (11.1 percent),New York City (9.5 percent), Orange County (9.1 percent), Houston (8.9 percent), Boston (8.6 percent) and Los Angeles (8.5 percent).  Conversely, Detroit (5.8 percent), Atlanta (6.6 percent), Minneapolis/St. Paul (7.2 percent) and San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose (7.2 percent) experienced lower-than-average rate increases in 2011.

Social media can be an effective recruitment tool for clinical trials

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

Blue ChipBlue Chip Patient Recruitment, a division of global, full-service marketing agency Blue Chip Marketing Worldwide, has authored a white paper advising patient recruitment specialists on how to effectively implement social media into their recruitment strategies.

The white paper, titled, “Patient Recruitment and the E-patient: A Survey Analysis,” is available at www.bluechipww.com/healthcare. It summarizes the results of a market research survey Blue Chip conducted of 179 adults from February through April 2011 and offers 11 key takeaways for recruitment specialists to consider when interacting with the E-Patient population (actively-engaged members of health-related social media networks). These include:

  • Engage a Physician: Credibility continues to be one of the biggest obstacles for E-Patients when considering participating in a clinical trial. Eighty percent of survey respondents prefer to receive clinical trial information online from a physician, indicating that physicians need to play an active role in online communities. Only 19% of respondents were comfortable receiving information through a Facebook wall and 14% comfortable receiving it via a Twitter profile.
  • Develop Approved Responses in Advance: Of even greater concern than credibility is clinical trial safety, as clinical trials in general have adopted a negative stigma within society. Forty-one percent of surveyed individuals expressed most concern with trial safety, as compared with only 36 percent who were more concerned about trial credibility. The white paper recommends developing a variety of approved responses prior to launching social campaigns, which can address an E-Patient’s concern about drug safety and other frequently asked questions.
  • Be Relevant to the Audience: While the goal is to recruit patients for the trial, it is important to first establish a role in the community. If the communication via online message forums is solely about the trial, the representatives will most likely be seen as intruders and message pushers. They can build credibility by posting relevant content, being attentive to the tenor of the dialogue, being consistent with the frequency of their interactions and being timely with responses.

“Social media has the potential to connect hundreds of thousands of interested participants to clinical trials immediately,” said Stanton Kawer, CEO of Blue Chip Marketing Worldwide. “This white paper sheds new light on what these individuals are looking for when they consider enrolling in a clinical trial, and illustrates how Blue Chip Patient Recruitment is effectively using social media to assist our pharmaceutical clients with recruitment solutions.”

The white paper also cited a huge untapped population of potential clinical trial participants among E-Patients. Eighty-one percent of those surveyed said they were interested in participating in clinical trials, but of that group, only 16 percent have done so.

A key reason for this could be a serious lack of awareness about participation opportunities. Only 30 percent of respondents said that they were aware of such major patient recruitment sites as ClinicalTrials.gov, CenterWatch.com and CISCRP.org, suggesting there is tremendous opportunity to educate E-Patients and build awareness. More targeted social media strategies can help recruitment specialists disperse this information where it is needed most.

Improving the efficiency of clinical trials through social media communication can have huge implications for the healthcare industry. An estimated 85 percent of clinical trials experience delays in patient recruitment. According to Life Science Leader, one month of delays can account for $40 million in lost sales for a newly-approved prescription drug.

CFOs top concerns: heathcare, controlling spending, morale

Thursday, June 16th, 2011

RobertHalfmanagementresourcesThere’s no shortage of pressures facing today’s top finance professionals, according to a new Robert Half report, CFO Concerns: What Are the Top Challenges Facing Today’s Financial Executives? The report highlights a number of issues impacting the role, namely managing healthcare insurance expenses, controlling spending and maintaining staff morale.

The report was developed by Robert Half Management Resources, and is based on a survey conducted by an independent research firm. The survey includes responses from 1,400 chief financial officers (CFOs) from a stratified random sample of U.S. companies with 20 or more employees.

Key areas of concern include the following:

  • Regulatory issues: When asked about their chief concerns in the regulatory arena, 62 percent of CFOs pointed to recently passed healthcare reforms. Seven percent of respondents cited the possible conversion to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and 3 percentmentioned the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.
  • Healthcare costs: Thirty-four percent of CFOs said their companies are responding to rising healthcare insurance costs by increasing employees’ contributions to their premiums; 28 percentnoted their companies are assuming the higher costs, and 20 percent said they are reducing healthcare benefits.
  • Staff retention: Twenty-nine percent of CFOs said subsidized training and education are the perks they offer or plan to offer in 2011 to retain employees. Flexible work hours/telecommuting and mentoring programs followed, each cited by 24 percent of respondents.

“Although many concerns of financial executives are not new issues, they are compounded by today’s economic and regulatory uncertainty,” said Paul McDonald, senior executive director of Robert Half Management Resources. “Leaders continue to be tested in multiple ways – they are managing issues for which there are no right answers or proven outcomes, while at the same time trying to motivate top performers. In this changing environment, building strong internal and external networks can help executives develop best practices and remain informed of new trends.”

Download CFO Concerns: What Are the Top Challenges Facing Today’s Financial Executives? bit.ly/CFO_Concerns.

World Health Organization says cell phone radiation possibly causes cancer

Wednesday, June 1st, 2011

person with cell phoneThe World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) says it has classified the radiation from cell phones as “possibly” carcinogenic.

“The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans, based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer,” said the agency.

“Over the last few years, there has been mounting concern about the possibility of adverse health effects resulting from exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, such as those emitted by wireless communication devices. The number of mobile phone subscriptions is estimated at 5 billion globally,” the agency said.

IARC Director Christopher Wild said, “Given the potential consequences for public health of this classification and findings, it is important that additional research be conducted into the long‐term, heavy use of mobile phones. Pending the availability of such information, it is important to take pragmatic measures to reduce exposure such as hands‐free devices or texting.”

One industry trade group, CTIA responded, “This IARC classification does not mean cell phones cause cancer. Based on previous assessments of the scientific evidence, the Federal Communications Commission has concluded that ‘[t]here’s no scientific evidence that proves that wireless phone usage can lead to cancer.’ The Food and Drug Administration has also stated that ‘[t]he weight of scientific evidence has not linked cellphones with any health problems.”

We have reported previously that cell phone radiation does have measurable effects on the brain – although in the short term, they may actually be beneficial. As the FDA notes, thus far, studies have failed to show any link to cell phone use and health problems.

See also:

Cell phone radiation levels

Mobile phones and health

How Cell phone radiation works

Will Social Media like Twitter be the next life-saving 911?

Thursday, May 5th, 2011

Emory Woodruff ATLANTA – As the old philosophical question begs, “If a tree falls in the middle of a forest with no one around to hear it, does it really make a sound?” Or as an Emory Healthcare marketing and social media expert recently asked and received an answer to, “If a critically ill woman in rural south Georgia needed immediate specialized medical care, would anyone more than 150 miles away hear her family member’s desperate “tweets” in time to send a life-saving helicopter?”

The answer to that question was an incredible “yes we did, and sure we can.”

Another first for social media?

Social media technology has been credited in recent years with everything from reuniting lost friends and loved ones to starting a couple on the path to wedded bliss (or divorce), to even starting an organized nationwide revolution in Egypt. But a recent connection in cyberspace starting in rural Southern Georgia may be yet another first in social media’s rise.

At 11:06 a.m. on April 25, Emory Healthcare Web and social media specialist Morgan Griffith received a “tweet” from Connecticut resident Matthew Browning, who was playing a critical role in helping his wife and family in getting through a crisis situation.

The grandmother of Browning’s wife was suffering from a host of dangerous medical issues, including, most urgently, a ruptured aorta. Being in a highly rural area, no local hospitals were equipped to accept or care for a patient with such complex needs.

Browning immediately took to Twitter and thus began a new journey between patient, concerned family member, a social media manager, and a hospital admissions unit.

A conflict between health care and social media

“There has existed an inherent conflict between health care and social media for quite some time. Health care is innately private, secure, and confidential, and that makes people worry when coupled with such a fast, open, and uncensored dialogue as the one taking place in the social media space,” says Griffith.

“On that incredible Monday, we got a glimpse of the potential these two realms have in becoming an extremely useful, successful and potentially life-saving duo. It was a truly moving and powerful experience to be a part of.”

Browning’s first “tweet” read as follows, “@emoryhealthcare (Emory’s Twitter account address) NEED HELP NOW!! Grandma w/ RUPTURED AORTA needs Card Surgeon/OR ASAP, STAT! Can you accept Life Flight NOW!!?”

Everything changes

“While much of our social media is proactive and conversational, when we receive a tweet like Matthew’s, everything changes. We must immediately throw out the process flowcharts, remove all barriers, and act. Instantaneously, things shift into high gear and a number of contacts in a variety of departments are contacted to get the right information as quickly as possible,” says Griffith.

“Within minutes, we tweeted back to Matthew, “@MatthewBrowning Matthew: please either call 911 or have your grandma’s doctor call our transfer service to get immediate help at 404-XXX-XXXX.”

At this point, the most important thing was giving Browning information he could act on. When using Twitter, messages can only be 140 characters, so it was critical to include the most necessary information for him to get immediate assistance, explains Griffith.

Four minutes later, at 11:21 a.m., Browning responded, “@emoryhealthcare: We are doing that! She is in small South Georgia hosp right now- but needs MAJOR help- We are calling, thanks!”

Griffith responded “@MatthewBrowning keep us posted & please let us know if there is anything else we can do to help. We’re keeping you both in our thoughts.” One minute later, Browning responded back “@hospitalpolicygrp, @emoryhealthcare: Thank you for your help!” Followed by: “@emoryhealthcare:  Look for STAT Transfer from South Georgia, accept her if able and we’ll see you soon. Thanks!”

Sixteen minutes later, at 11:41 a.m., the patient was on a helicopter to Emory University Hospital in Atlanta.

“@emoryhealthcare: Thank you for accepting her. She is on the Life Flight to you now- Bless you all and Thank you!!”

Now a textbook lesson

Unfortunately, the patient would not survive her traumatic illness, but, according to both Griffith and Browning, the experience is now a textbook lesson – proving that social media technology and the vast network it has created can allow more than one person to hear the tree falling in an even larger forest; hence, offering new life-saving opportunities not existent just a few short years ago.

“Our dialogue with Matthew on Monday continued on through the day, and not all of the tweets we received or sent are included above, but if that doesn’t show you the power of social media, I don’t know what will,” said Griffith. “It’s true that the same outcome may have taken place if it had not been for social media. But when a life is hanging in the balance and minutes – not hours – make the difference, the risk of ignoring technology such as social media to intervene and save a life is one we’re not willing to take.”

And, of course, the last message from Browning arrived same as the first.  “@emoryhealthcare: Thank You for your valiant efforts on behalf of our Grandmother – your team is awesome and their compassion unrivaled- thx“.

The full story of the interaction between Matthew and Emory Healthcare can be found on Emory Healthcare’s blog, where they have published a two part case study on the story:

Can Twitter Help Save Lives – A Health Care Social Media Case Study, Part I

Can Twitter Help Save Lives – A Health Care Social Media Case Study, Part II

 

TechJournal South is a TechMedia company. TechMedia presents the annual conferences:

SoutheastVentureConference: www.seventure.org

Internet Summit: www.internetsummit.com

Digital East: www.digitaleast.com

Digital Summit: www.digitalsummit.com